Driving Differentiation: How top-performing automotive companies balance quality, cost, and sustainability

In the race to win customers and remain profitable, automotive companies face an ongoing balancing act. Standing out in a crowded market isn’t just about bold design or breakthrough tech—it’s about making the right strategic decisions early, when they have the most impact.
According to industry research, 70–80% of a vehicle’s lifecycle costs and up to 80% of its environmental impact are locked in during the early phases of product development. That means engineering, procurement, and sustainability teams must align quickly and effectively to make smart, forward-looking choices. But there’s a problem: critical data is often fragmented, outdated, or simply unavailable.
This blog explores the advantages companies gain by addressing this issue head-on.
The three key differentiators: Cost, quality, and carbon footprint
According to recent research by Tech-Clarity based on a survey of 178 automotive companies (OEMs and suppliers), cost, quality, and product carbon footprint rank as the top differentiators for automotive OEMs and suppliers. These factors don’t just drive profitability—they increasingly determine whether a company can compete at all.
However, assessing these factors requires teams from multiple disciplines—sales, design, procurement, and sustainability—to have access to the same, reliable data. When that doesn’t happen, trade-offs between cost, quality, and environmental impact become harder to evaluate. And with competing priorities, teams often don’t have the time or tools to gather the data they need.
Win more bids with better insight
When it comes to winning new business, competitive pricing and reliable delivery remain top priorities. That makes cost visibility crucial: you need to quote prices that are both attractive and sustainable for your bottom line.
But increasingly, carbon footprint is the tiebreaker—especially in regions with strict environmental regulations or customer preferences leaning toward sustainability. When price and delivery are equal, the company with the greener product often wins.
Make better decisions earlier
Early-stage cost and carbon footprint estimates can be game-changers. When cost engineering teams have access to comprehensive data early in development, they can make decisions that cut costs and lower emissions, without sacrificing quality.
But timing is everything. These early decisions have the most influence, and missing the window to act can lead to expensive course corrections later.
Don’t just connect data—Keep it current
Even the best decisions will fall flat if they’re based on outdated or incomplete data. As designs evolve and supplier information changes, teams need a “digital thread”—a consistent, traceable flow of information from concept to delivery.
This traceability provides automotive teams a clearer picture of how a decision made today will affect cost, quality, and sustainability downstream.
Invest in the right software solutions
So, how do top-performing companies get it right? One key factor is using software that consolidates data from across the organization, including PLM, CAD, ERP, and supply chain systems.
With the right solutions, companies gain a unified view of everything from material specifications and supplier data to real-time cost and emissions estimates. That makes cross-functional decision-making faster, smarter, and more aligned with strategic goals.
Final thoughts: Turning insight into advantage
The road to differentiation in the automotive industry isn’t straightforward. It’s a complex journey of balancing trade-offs across cost, quality, innovation, and sustainability. But with the right solutions and a unified approach to decision-making, automakers and suppliers alike can carve out a clear advantage in a crowded marketplace.
For automotive OEMs and suppliers, differentiation comes down to the decisions made early in the lifecycle—and the quality of data driving those decisions. Companies that empower their teams with timely, consolidated insights into cost, quality, and environmental impact will not only win more bids, but they’ll build vehicles that lead the market in performance and sustainability.
This report takes a closer look at how top-performing automotive companies are already doing just that—and what others can learn from their approach.
More information
- Blog: The power of integrated product cost and carbon analysis in the automotive industry
- Reference Story: ZF uses Teamcenter Product Cost Management to improve the trade-offs between costs and the carbon footprint
- Free Trial: Utilize Teamcenter Product Cost Management to reduce cost and carbon footprint early in development